George "Worry" Bush on cloning
I'm still busy with deadlines, but I'm taking a breather, and this is just screaming for attention.
Pandering to his base of "theocons" (which means religious conservatives who will not be content until the whole nation and the rest of the world fall in line with their narrow and self-serving interpretation of God's Will), President George W. Bush has lashed out at South Korean scientist Dr. Hwang Woo-sok, the man whose team recently announced that they cloned the stem cells of specific individuals who are sick or injured, as part of the process of tailor-making stem cells that won't be rejected by patients.
This is a major step, which is why Bush is majorly unhappy: "I'm very concerned about cloning," Bush told reporters in the Oval Office on Friday. "I worry about a world in which cloning becomes acceptable." (Contrary to early press reports, Bush did not say, "Woo-sok, you suck!")
So, Mr. Bush worries about a world in which cloning becomes acceptable?
Well you know what, Mr. President? I worry about a world in which unilateral attacks on a sovereign state under false pretenses become acceptable.
I worry about a world where it's okay to kill thousands of actual humans under false pretenses. And where the person who did this makes no apologies.
I worry about a world in which money to reduce unwanted pregnancy and the spread of STDs is withheld because some of the programs don't fit with fundamentalists' beliefs.
I worry about a world where lesbians/gays are demonized in order to win political points with a group of supposed Christians who wouldn't know Jesus Christ's words if they came up and bit them on the ass He rode to Jerusalem on.
I worry about a country where certain religious groups feel that it's okay to start dismantling the separation of church and state that has been a cornerstone of the nation, just because they happen to be in power.
God, if someone like Bush gets the GOP nomination in 2008, I may give up my membership. I don't know how much more I can take. I don't know how much more the country can take. I may end up registering independent and then just voting for Republicans who remember that being a Republican means fiscal responsibility, little government interference, and separation of church and state. (On second thought, better keep my membership at least through the primaries.)
And then there's the bashing of a Korean scientific icon at a time when South Koreans already have enough reasons to dislike Bush, thanks to his off-the-cuff remarks and some very ill-conceived bits of rhetoric. Oh, and that whole war thing.
Are Dr. Hwang's laboratory activities really a priority for the USA? Aren't they keeping you busy there in Washington? Go fix the national debt or something.


7 Comments:
Different from you, Nora, I support the president of the United States of America one hundered percent.
There is no reason to engage in this sickening area of research. There is no reason to use human eggs to grow stem cells. The same research can be done with mouse, pig or dogs.
Just think about it. We create a human being inside the testube so that we can "play" with it and "consume" its parts? Where is the sanctity of human life?
The point is moot, however. I suspect Dr.Hwang to be lying. He has not succeeded in creating a human stem cell line. His lab should be thoughly investigated for falsifying results. His team has lied before.
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/040503/pf/429003a_pf.html
"I worry about a world in which unilateral attacks on a sovereign state under false pretenses become acceptable. I worry about a world where it's okay to kill thousands under false pretenses. And where the person who did this makes no apologies."
The world has been this way for centuries. You should've been worried long before your current president was elected. If anything, the Iraq war has been one of the least bloodiest international wars in history since the 18th century.
You also ignore the importance of science. Just because stem cell research isn't directly related to economy or world politics, it does not mean a world leader should not comment on a historic scientific advance that happens to carry significance outside the scientific realm. It isn't just the religious faithful who are questioning the morality of stem cell research.
As for America's national debt, I don't believe your government is relying on people of your intellectual capacity to play any significant role in relieving the financial burden.
Before they do that, my impression from the contents of this blog is that the improvement of the American education system is of greater importance.
I am thankful that Bush doesn't control the labs in every country. If he and his fundamentalist cronies want to cripply scientific process in the States, then they will quickly realize that the US scientists are going to get left behing. I don't think stem cell research is sickening or immoral. If we treat all organic material that has the potential of becoming human, then is it moral for me to use a condom? Damn right it is, and it's quite responsible of me to do so, yet conservative Christian Americans would shout in horror. Funny tho, I don't see them footing the bill to raise unwanted kids...
Of course that's getting off on a totally unrelated subject. Stem cells are not human beings. They are harvested long before they form into any type of organ.
Also, I agree with "anonymous" that the US should spend more time and money on improving the American education system, especially in the area of science, and especially in Kansas. Considering that we have a Yaleman president who can't seem to make public speeches without appearing like a total idiot, it really doesn't say much for American education.
Finally "anonymous" I think you're being too harsh on Nora. Perhaps you have a blog where your "intellectual superiority" shines through? It's easy to criticize from the sidelines...
Don't worry, be happy! :)
I have to say I agree with you on most of what you said Nora.
As for baduk, sorry mate but as a microbiology graduate I'm sorry to tell you that you cannot achieve the same results with pig, or any other animal's eggs. You can clone them of course, but it won't help you much if you're trying to create immunologically compatible stem cells for human patients.
As for anonymous, the fact that there have been bloodier wars in the past does not mean that the Iraq war was justified, nor does it excuse national leaders from their responsibilities. I would have thought with your [sarcasm] obviously superior intellect [end sarcasm] you would have considered that.
I 100% agree with you, Nora. Why couldn’t other Republicans think like her? If Nora gave up her Republican membership, I would definitely consider giving up my sexual preference!
june cho wrote:
If Nora gave up her Republican membership, I would definitely consider giving up my sexual preference!
is that a dare?
wait a minute, you said you would 'consider' it. this sounds like a pyongyang promise.
never mind. all the way or no way!
Post a Comment
<< Home